[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YyQTmZG/tNWd/ErO@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 09:11:37 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: yangyicong@...ilicon.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
jonnyc@...zon.com, hhhawa@...zon.com, andriy.shevchenko@...el.com,
farbere@...zon.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: + libfs-fix-error-format-in-simple_attr_write.patch added to
mm-nonmm-unstable branch
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 02:34:25PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> libfs-fix-error-format-in-simple_attr_write.patch
> From: Eliav Farber <farbere@...zon.com>
> Subject: libfs: fix error format in simple_attr_write()
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:15:44 +0000
>
> In commit 488dac0c9237 ("libfs: fix error cast of negative value in
> simple_attr_write()"), simple_attr_write() was changed to use kstrtoull()
> instead of simple_strtoll() to convert a string got from a user. A user
> trying to set a negative value will get an error.
>
> This is wrong since it breaks all the places that use
> DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE() with format of a signed integer.
>
> For the record there are 43 current users of signed integer which are
> likely to be effected by this:
>
> $ git grep -n -A1 -w DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE | grep ');' |
> sed 's,.*\(".*%.*"\).*,\1,' | sort | uniq -c
> 1 "%08llx\n"
> 5 "0x%016llx\n"
> 5 "0x%02llx\n"
> 5 "0x%04llx\n"
> 13 "0x%08llx\n"
> 1 "0x%4.4llx\n"
> 3 "0x%.4llx\n"
> 4 "0x%llx\n"
> 1 "%1lld\n"
> 40 "%lld\n"
> 2 "%lli\n"
> 129 "%llu\n"
> 1 "%#llx\n"
> 2 "%llx\n"
>
> u64 is not an issue for negative numbers.
> The %lld and %llu in any case are for 64-bit value, representing it as
> unsigned simplifies the generic code, but it doesn't mean we can't keep
> their signed value if we know that.
>
> This change uses sscanf() to fix the problem since it does the conversion
> based on the supplied format string.
> --- a/fs/libfs.c~libfs-fix-error-format-in-simple_attr_write
> +++ a/fs/libfs.c
> @@ -1017,9 +1017,12 @@ ssize_t simple_attr_write(struct file *f
> goto out;
>
> attr->set_buf[size] = '\0';
> - ret = kstrtoull(attr->set_buf, 0, &val);
> - if (ret)
> + ret = sscanf(attr->set_buf, attr->fmt, &val);
> + if (ret != 1) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> + }
> +
> ret = attr->set(attr->data, val);
> if (ret == 0)
> ret = len; /* on success, claim we got the whole input */
No scanf please. Just revert original patch if something broke.
scanf may be tolerable if it is just one format conversion but it is
disaster as an interface.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists