[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220916072257.9639-17-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 15:22:57 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <david@...hat.com>,
<osalvador@...e.de>, <anshuman.khandual@....com>
CC: <willy@...radead.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 16/16] mm/page_alloc: fix obsolete comment in deferred_pfn_valid()
There are no architectures that can have holes in the memory map within
a pageblock since commit 859a85ddf90e ("mm: remove pfn_valid_within()
and CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE"). Update the corresponding comment.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 3d2ad5c197d5..d7b20bf09c1c 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1929,11 +1929,7 @@ static inline void __init pgdat_init_report_one_done(void)
/*
* Returns true if page needs to be initialized or freed to buddy allocator.
*
- * First we check if pfn is valid on architectures where it is possible to have
- * holes within pageblock_nr_pages. On systems where it is not possible, this
- * function is optimized out.
- *
- * Then, we check if a current large page is valid by only checking the validity
+ * We check if a current large page is valid by only checking the validity
* of the head pfn.
*/
static inline bool __init deferred_pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists