linux-kernel - [PATCH v3] remoteproc: core: do pm relax when in RPROC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Sep 2022 09:36:23 +0800
From:   Maria Yu <quic_aiquny@...cinc.com>
To:     <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC:     Maria Yu <quic_aiquny@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_clew@...cinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] remoteproc: core: do pm relax when in RPROC_OFFLINE

RPROC_OFFLINE state indicate there is no recovery process
is in progress and no chance to do the pm_relax.
Because when recovering from crash, rproc->lock is held and
state is RPROC_CRASHED -> RPROC_OFFLINE -> RPROC_RUNNING,
and then unlock rproc->lock.
When the state is in RPROC_OFFLINE it means separate request
of rproc_stop was done and no need to hold the wakeup source
in crash handler to recover any more.

Signed-off-by: Maria Yu <quic_aiquny@...cinc.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index e5279ed9a8d7..247ced6b0655 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1956,6 +1956,17 @@ static void rproc_crash_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	if (rproc->state == RPROC_CRASHED || rproc->state == RPROC_OFFLINE) {
 		/* handle only the first crash detected */
 		mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
+		/*
+		 * RPROC_OFFLINE state indicate there is no recovery process
+		 * is in progress and no chance to have pm_relax in place.
+		 * Because when recovering from crash, rproc->lock is hold and
+		 * state is RPROC_CRASHED -> RPROC_OFFLINE -> RPROC_RUNNING,
+		 * and then unlock rproc->lock.
+		 * RPROC_OFFLINE is only an intermediate state in recovery
+		 * process.
+		 */
+		if (rproc->state == RPROC_OFFLINE)
+			pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
 		return;
 	}
 
-- 
2.7.4