[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1663294501-6377-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:15:01 +0800
From: cy_huang <u0084500@...il.com>
To: rafael@...nel.org, len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
anton@...msg.org, ccross@...roid.com, tony.luck@...el.com
Cc: cy_huang@...htek.com, gene_chen@...htek.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] PM: core: Add pm_wakeup_pending check in device suspend_noirq
From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
In 'dpm_suspend_noirq', it will do the sychronized_irq to guarantee all
irqs are all done, and then do any wakeup flag set.
For some peripherial deivces like as I2C/SPI, to speed up the irq handling,
it may use 'pm_stay_awake' and really handle in another thread context like
as workqueue.
But in mem suspend flow, after 'dpm_suspend_noirq" stage, the next
'pm_wakeup_pending' check will be at 'syscore_suspend'.
The checkpoint seems too late and cause I2C/SPI fail during 'noirq' to
'syscore_suspend'. But some adapter was already be marked as 'suspended'
at 'noirq' callback, any I2C/SPI xfer will return the error flag '-ESHUTDOWN'.
After the code trace, it seems all device callback will do 'pm_wakeup_pending'
check, except 'noirq'.
This patch is to add 'pm_wakeup_pending' check in 'noirq' sage to prevent this
kind of usage.
Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
---
Hi,
Is there any rule to define when I2C/SPI host controller need to mark adapter as
'suspended'?
I trace 'drivers/i2c/buses'.It seems there's no common rule, Some are 'suspend',
others may did it at 'suspend_noirq'.
---
drivers/base/power/main.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
index c501392..7cd7dc5 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -1210,6 +1210,11 @@ static int __device_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state, bool a
if (async_error)
goto Complete;
+ if (pm_wakeup_pending()) {
+ async_error = -EBUSY;
+ goto Complete;
+ }
+
if (dev->power.syscore || dev->power.direct_complete)
goto Complete;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists