[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <c243fd70-782c-4663-b08d-99f44ae55fc3@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:45:17 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Christian Marangi" <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@...nel.org>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@....at>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@...com>,
"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@...nel.org>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: raw: qcom_nandc: handle error pointer from adm
prep_slave_sg
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022, at 5:11 AM, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 11:01:11AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review and the clarification!
> (Also extra point the fixes tag will match the driver)
Regarding the fixes tag, how did you actually get to my patch?
While it's possible that it caused the regression, it did not
introduce the ERR_PTR() usage that was already there in
5c9f8c2dbdbe ("dmaengine: qcom: Add ADM driver").
Maybe there is another bug that needs to be addressed in this
driver?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists