[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEVeK2CMs8J3urkZnRpbW=965sT51N3Qey=0y-JwkvHZy_FFRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 22:50:58 +0800
From: tuo cao <91tuocao@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] docs: x86: replace do_IRQ int the entry_64.rst with common_interrupt()
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> 于2022年9月16日周五 01:35写道:
>
> Tuo Cao <91tuocao@...il.com> writes:
>
> > do_IRQ has been replaced by common_interrupt in commit
> > fa5e5c409213 ("x86/entry: Use idtentry for interrupts").
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tuo Cao <91tuocao@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/x86/entry_64.rst | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/x86/entry_64.rst b/Documentation/x86/entry_64.rst
> > index e433e08f7018..0afdce3c06f4 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/x86/entry_64.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/x86/entry_64.rst
> > @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ Some of these entries are:
> > - interrupt: An array of entries. Every IDT vector that doesn't
> > explicitly point somewhere else gets set to the corresponding
> > value in interrupts. These point to a whole array of
> > - magically-generated functions that make their way to do_IRQ with
> > - the interrupt number as a parameter.
> > + magically-generated functions that make their way to common_interrupt()
> > + with the interrupt number as a parameter.
> >
> > - APIC interrupts: Various special-purpose interrupts for things
> > like TLB shootdown.
>
> So why have you sent a "v3" the same day? It doesn't look like anything
> has changed...?
"v3" has wrote common_interrupt() with the brackets.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists