linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 05/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration feature flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c4a9ea23-4280-d54c-263b-354ea321f746@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:55:13 -0700
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, <corbet@....net>,
        <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        <rdunlap@...radead.org>, <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        <songmuchun@...edance.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>, <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        <jmattson@...gle.com>, <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
        <sandipan.das@....com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        <james.morse@....com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add Bandwidth Monitoring Event
 Configuration feature flag

Hi Babu,

On 9/7/2022 11:00 AM, Babu Moger wrote:
> Newer AMD processors support the new feature Bandwidth Monitoring Event
> Configuration (BMEC).
> 
> Support of this feature is available via CPUID Fn8000_0020_EBX_x0 (ECX=0).
> Bits    Field Name       Description
> 3        EVT_CFG         Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration (BMEC)
> 
> Currently, the bandwidth monitoring events mbm_total_bytes and
> mbm_local_bytes are set to count all the total and local reads/writes
> respectively. With the introduction of SLOW memory, the two counters are

Why is SLOW in caps?

> not enough to count all the different types of memory events. With the
> feature BMEC, the users have the option to configure mbm_total_bytes and
> mbm_local_bytes to count the specific type of events.
> 
> Each BMEC event has a configuration MSR, QOS_EVT_CFG (0x000_0400h +
> EventID) which contains one field for each Bandwidth Type that can be used
> to configure the bandwidth event to track any combination of supported
> bandwidth types. The event will count requests from every Bandwidth Type
> bit that is set in the corresponding configuration register.
> 
> Following are the types of events supported:
> 
> ====    ========================================================
> Bits    Description
> ====    ========================================================
> 6       Dirty Victims from the QOS domain to all types of memory
> 5       Reads to slow memory in the non-local NUMA domain
> 4       Reads to slow memory in the local NUMA domain
> 3       Non-temporal writes to non-local NUMA domain
> 2       Non-temporal writes to local NUMA domain
> 1       Reads to memory in the non-local NUMA domain
> 0       Reads to memory in the local NUMA domain
> ====    ========================================================
> 
> By default, the mbm_total_bytes configuration is set to 0x7F to count
> all the event types and the mbm_local_bytes configuration is set to
> 0x15 to count all the local memory events.
> 
> Feature description is available in the specification, "AMD64 Technology
> Platform Quality of Service Extensions, Revision: 1.03 Publication # 56375
> Revision: 1.03 Issue Date: February 2022".
> 
> Link: https://www.amd.com/en/support/tech-docs/amd64-technology-platform-quality-service-extensions
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206537
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h |    1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c    |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index 1815435c9c88..a4ee02a56d54 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -305,6 +305,7 @@
>  #define X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB_FW		(11*32+16) /* "" Use IBPB during runtime firmware calls */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE	(11*32+17) /* "" Fill RSB on VM exit when EIBRS is enabled */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_SMBA		(11*32+18) /* SLOW Memory Bandwidth Allocation */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_BMEC		(11*32+18) /* AMD Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration (BMEC) */

(numbering issue has already been discussed)

>  
>  /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:1 (EAX), word 12 */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX_VNNI		(12*32+ 4) /* AVX VNNI instructions */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> index 885ecf46abb2..7981df0b910e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_bit cpuid_bits[] = {
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_PROC_FEEDBACK,    CPUID_EDX, 11, 0x80000007, 0 },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_MBA,		CPUID_EBX,  6, 0x80000008, 0 },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_SMBA,             CPUID_EBX,  2, 0x80000020, 0 },
> +	{ X86_FEATURE_BMEC,             CPUID_EBX,  3, 0x80000020, 0 },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2,	CPUID_EAX,  0, 0x80000022, 0 },
>  	{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }
>  };
> 
> 

Similar to previous - please use same coding style as area being changed.

Is there a feature dependency (cpuid_deps[]) on X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC needed?

Reinette