[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa3cbecb-636f-cece-0c6f-97f67f060cdb@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 09:17:54 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, <corbet@....net>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <paulmck@...nel.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
<rdunlap@...radead.org>, <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
<songmuchun@...edance.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<jpoimboe@...nel.org>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
<chang.seok.bae@...el.com>, <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
<jmattson@...gle.com>, <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
<sandipan.das@....com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
<james.morse@....com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
<eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/13] x86/resctrl: Replace smp_call_function_many with
on_each_cpu_mask
Hi Babu,
On 9/7/2022 11:01 AM, Babu Moger wrote:
> The call on_each_cpu_mask can run the function on each CPU specified by
parenthesis are used to indicate functions, in this case, please write
"on_each_cpu_mask()" and "smp_call_function_many()" instead.
> cpumask, which may include the local processor. So, replace the call
> smp_call_function_many with on_each_cpu_mask to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists