[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220917104311.1878250-7-yanaijie@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 18:43:10 +0800
From: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
To: <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<hare@...e.com>, <hch@....de>, <bvanassche@....org>,
<john.garry@...wei.com>, <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] scsi: pm8001: use dev_and_phy_addr_same() instead of open coded
The sas address comparation of domain device and expander phy is open
coded. Now we can replace it with dev_and_phy_addr_same().
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
---
drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
index 8e3f2f9ddaac..bb1b1722f3ee 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
@@ -649,8 +649,7 @@ static int pm8001_dev_found_notify(struct domain_device *dev)
for (phy_id = 0; phy_id < parent_dev->ex_dev.num_phys;
phy_id++) {
phy = &parent_dev->ex_dev.ex_phy[phy_id];
- if (SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr)
- == SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr)) {
+ if (dev_and_phy_addr_same(dev, phy)) {
pm8001_device->attached_phy = phy_id;
break;
}
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists