linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix coding style issue in block comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 17 Sep 2022 21:38:49 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Kang Minchul <tegongkang@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix coding style issue in block
 comment

Hi,

On 9/17/22 20:11, Kang Minchul wrote:
> This patch removes the following warning generated by checkpatch.pl
> 
>   WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
>   #206: FILE: rtw_recv.c:206:
>   +/*
>   +signed int     rtw_enqueue_recvframe(union recv_frame *precvframe, struct __queue *queue)
> 
>   WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
>   #216: FILE: rtw_recv.c:216:
>   +/*
>   +caller : defrag ; recvframe_chk_defrag in recv_thread  (passive)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kang Minchul <tegongkang@...il.com>

Thanks, patch looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

Regards,

Hans


> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
> index d8d394b67eeb..ad6fb6c3d1f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
> @@ -203,22 +203,22 @@ signed int rtw_enqueue_recvframe(union recv_frame *precvframe, struct __queue *q
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -signed int	rtw_enqueue_recvframe(union recv_frame *precvframe, struct __queue *queue)
> -{
> -	return rtw_free_recvframe(precvframe, queue);
> -}
> -*/
> + * signed int	rtw_enqueue_recvframe(union recv_frame *precvframe, struct __queue *queue)
> + * {
> + * 	return rtw_free_recvframe(precvframe, queue);
> + * }
> + */
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  /*
> -caller : defrag ; recvframe_chk_defrag in recv_thread  (passive)
> -pframequeue: defrag_queue : will be accessed in recv_thread  (passive)
> -
> -using spinlock to protect
> -
> -*/
> + * caller : defrag ; recvframe_chk_defrag in recv_thread  (passive)
> + * pframequeue: defrag_queue : will be accessed in recv_thread  (passive)
> + *
> + * using spinlock to protect
> + *
> + */
>  
>  void rtw_free_recvframe_queue(struct __queue *pframequeue,  struct __queue *pfree_recv_queue)
>  {