linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] pinctrl: ocelot: add missing destroy_workqueue() in error path in ocelot_pinctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <af4a818f-a182-79ee-d030-ee70ac181c05@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Sep 2022 10:28:19 +0800
From:   Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
CC:     <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] pinctrl: ocelot: add missing
 destroy_workqueue() in error path in ocelot_pinctrl_probe()


On 2022/9/17 3:01, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 09/15/2022 23:14, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>
> Hi Yang,
>
>> Add the missing destroy_workqueue() before return from ocelot_pinctrl_probe()
>> in error path.
>>
>> Fixes: c297561bc98a ("pinctrl: ocelot: Fix interrupt controller")
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c
>> index d9c0184c077f..83703a3d291c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c
>> @@ -2072,15 +2072,19 @@ static int ocelot_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>          info->pincfg_data = &data->pincfg_data;
>>
>>          reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(dev, "switch");
>> -       if (IS_ERR(reset))
>> -               return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(reset),
>> -                                    "Failed to get reset\n");
>> +       if (IS_ERR(reset)) {
>> +               ret = dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(reset),
>> +                                   "Failed to get reset\n");
>> +               goto err_out;
>> +       }
>>          reset_control_reset(reset);
>>
>>          base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev,
>>                          platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0));
>> -       if (IS_ERR(base))
>> -               return PTR_ERR(base);
>> +       if (IS_ERR(base)) {
>> +               ret = PTR_ERR(base);
>> +               goto err_out;
>> +       }
>>
>>          info->stride = 1 + (info->desc->npins - 1) / 32;
>>
>> @@ -2089,7 +2093,8 @@ static int ocelot_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>          info->map = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &regmap_config);
>>          if (IS_ERR(info->map)) {
>>                  dev_err(dev, "Failed to create regmap\n");
>> -               return PTR_ERR(info->map);
>> +               ret = PTR_ERR(info->map);
>> +               goto err_out;
>>          }
>>          dev_set_drvdata(dev, info);
>>          info->dev = dev;
>> @@ -2105,15 +2110,19 @@ static int ocelot_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>>          ret = ocelot_pinctrl_register(pdev, info);
>>          if (ret)
>> -               return ret;
>> +               goto err_out;
> Wouldn't be better actually to add the allocation of the workqueue here?
> In this way, you will not need all the previous changes.
Yes, thanks.

Yang
>>          ret = ocelot_gpiochip_register(pdev, info);
>>          if (ret)
>> -               return ret;
>> +               goto err_out;
>>
>>          dev_info(dev, "driver registered\n");
>>
>>          return 0;
>> +
>> +err_out:
>> +       destroy_workqueue(info->wq);
>> +       return ret;
>>   }
>>
>>   static int ocelot_pinctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>