[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fbf58ad3-2eff-06df-6426-3b4629408e94@linux.dev>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 19:40:04 +0800
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, song@...nel.org,
logang@...tatee.com, pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yukuai3@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] md/raid10: don't modify 'nr_waitng' in
wait_barrier() for the case nowait
On 9/16/22 7:34 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>
> For the case nowait in wait_barrier(), there is no point to increase
> nr_waiting and then decrease it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid10.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index 37fd9284054e..df435d693637 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -990,17 +990,17 @@ static bool wait_barrier(struct r10conf *conf, bool nowait)
>
> spin_lock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
> if (conf->barrier) {
> - conf->nr_waiting++;
> /* Return false when nowait flag is set */
> if (nowait) {
> ret = false;
> } else {
> + conf->nr_waiting++;
> raid10_log(conf->mddev, "wait barrier");
> wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
> stop_waiting_barrier(conf),
> conf->resync_lock);
> + conf->nr_waiting--;
> }
> - conf->nr_waiting--;
> if (!conf->nr_waiting)
> wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
> }
Acked-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>
Thanks,
Guoqing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists