linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: 8250: Let drivers request full 16550A feature probing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8fa701a1-3f34-9152-daf6-1618dd0e7727@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2022 06:42:22 +0200
From:   Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To:     "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Anders Blomdell <anders.blomdell@...trol.lth.se>,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: 8250: Let drivers request full 16550A feature
 probing

On 17. 09. 22, 12:07, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> --- linux-macro.orig/include/linux/serial_core.h
> +++ linux-macro/include/linux/serial_core.h
> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ struct uart_icount {
>   	__u32	buf_overrun;
>   };
>   
> -typedef unsigned int __bitwise upf_t;
> +typedef __u64 __bitwise upf_t;

Why __u64 and not u64?

>   typedef unsigned int __bitwise upstat_t;
>   
>   struct uart_port {
> @@ -522,6 +522,7 @@ struct uart_port {
>   #define UPF_FIXED_PORT		((__force upf_t) (1 << 29))
>   #define UPF_DEAD		((__force upf_t) (1 << 30))
>   #define UPF_IOREMAP		((__force upf_t) (1 << 31))
> +#define UPF_FULL_PROBE		((__force upf_t) (1ULL << 32))

This looks like a perfect time to switch them all to BIT_ULL().

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs