[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM7w-FULuCCww8DMyvTuU_SLuyZWqfv3sVbvPtBorYEbhGUuUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 13:19:39 -0400
From: Sven van Ashbrook <svenva@...omium.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Olivia Mackall <olivia@...enic.com>,
Alex Levin <levinale@...gle.com>,
Andrey Pronin <apronin@...gle.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...gle.com>,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] random: move add_hwgenerator_randomness()'s wait
outside function
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 11:06 AM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>
> By the way, there was a recent ath9k patch that kind of went to a
> similar tune. [...] Maybe that's a potential solution here, or
> something similar to it.
Jason was kind enough to point me to the patch in question:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=36cb6494429bd64b27b7ff8b4af56f8e526da2b4
This patch limits the long sleep inside the fillfn kthread, by
terminating the sleep on
hwrng_unregister().
This doesn't appear like a viable approach for the suspend/resume issue?
- there is a great multitude of tpm_msleep()/msleep() calls in the tpm's
rng_get_data() path. They would all have to be made interruptible.
- even if interrupted successfully, now the kthread must be blocked until
after resume. If so, what is the point of using a non-freezable kthread.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists