[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YyioI4iBFq8ib9JT@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:34:27 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
parth@...ux.ibm.com, qais.yousef@....com, chris.hyser@...cle.com,
valentin.schneider@....com, patrick.bellasi@...bug.net,
David.Laight@...lab.com, pjt@...gle.com, pavel@....cz,
qperret@...gle.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, joshdon@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] sched/fair: Add sched group latency support
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 05:49:27PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > For `nice` we have `cpu.weight.nice` next to `cpu.weight` in cgroup v2 ?
>
> If everybody is ok, I can add back the cpu.latency.nice interface in
> the v5 in addition to the cpu.latency
Yeah, that sounds fine to me.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists