[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YyjI/JOcryD8yKzT@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 19:54:36 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>, mchehab@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
kishon@...com, vkoul@...nel.org, hverkuil@...all.nl,
jacopo@...ndi.org, kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] media: tc358746: add Toshiba TC358746 Parallel to
CSI-2 bridge driver
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 08:37:23PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > + ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_new_int_menu(&tc358746->ctrl_hdl, NULL,
> > > > + V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ, 0, 0,
> > >
> > > Shouldn't the max argument be set to the number of items minus 1 ?
> >
> > Right now I would keep it that way since the driver only supports one
> > link-frequencies setting. So the ctrl don't let the userspace assume
> > that there are more than one link-frequency.
>
> Good point. Can you add a short comment above the call to explain this ?
Wouldn't it be just easier to do what Laurent suggested originally? The end
result is the same, isn't it, and no comment needed?
>
> > > > + link_frequencies);
> > > > + if (ctrl)
> > > > + ctrl->flags |= V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_READ_ONLY;
Now that this is a bridge, this value presumably doesn't need to change.
There will just be more blanking if the source sub-device pixel rate is
slower, right?
--
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists