[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YyjonFBhyg814HS+@monkey>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 15:09:32 -0700
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, songmuchun@...edance.com,
willy@...radead.org, vbabka@...e.cz, william.kucharski@...cle.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de,
ccross@...gle.com, hughd@...gle.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] mm/hugetlb: add folio support to hugetlb specific
flag macros
On 09/08/22 12:37, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> Allows the macros which test, set, and clear hugetlb specific page
> flags to take a hugetlb folio as an input. The marcros are generated as
> folio_{test, set, clear}_hugetlb_{restore_reserve, migratable,
> temporary, freed, vmemmap_optimized, raw_hwp_unreliable}.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
I wish there was more usage of these new macros. The only usage is a
folio_test_hugetlb_restore_reserve() call in patch 5. Usage will expand
as more code is converted.
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists