[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166362904468.3419825.3057946964587586588.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 00:10:44 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Li Chen <lchen@...arella.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@...il.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: silence misleading error in probe
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:22:54 +0300, Mikhail Rudenko wrote:
> In the case when a codec device is probed before codec analog
> controls, snd_soc_register_card() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, resulting in
> a misleading error message
>
> sun4i-codec 1c22c00.codec: Failed to register our card
>
> even if the device is probed successfully later. Use dev_err_probe()
> to demote the above error to a debug message.
>
> [...]
Applied to
broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/2] ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: silence misleading error in probe
commit: 30248f618d30cf1ad9d5a72126799f2f0239860c
[2/2] ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: set debugfs_prefix for CPU DAI component
commit: 717a8ff20f32792d6a94f2883e771482c37d844b
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists