[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220919093747.00005bd6.zbestahu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:37:47 +0800
From: Yue Hu <zbestahu@...il.com>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
syzbot+f966c13b1b4fc0403b19@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: fix order >= MAX_ORDER warning due to crafted
nagative i_size
On Fri, 9 Sep 2022 10:39:48 +0800
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> As syzbot reported [1], the root cause is that i_size field is a
> signed type, and negative i_size is also less than EROFS_BLKSIZ.
> As a consequence, it's handled as fast symlink unexpectedly.
>
> Let's fall back to the generic path to deal with such unusual i_size.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000ac8efa05e7feaa1f@google.com
> Reported-by: syzbot+f966c13b1b4fc0403b19@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 431339ba9042 ("staging: erofs: add inode operations")
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/erofs/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/inode.c b/fs/erofs/inode.c
> index 95a403720e8c..16cf9a283557 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/inode.c
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int erofs_fill_symlink(struct inode *inode, void *kaddr,
>
> /* if it cannot be handled with fast symlink scheme */
> if (vi->datalayout != EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE ||
> - inode->i_size >= EROFS_BLKSIZ) {
> + inode->i_size >= EROFS_BLKSIZ || inode->i_size < 0) {
Reviewed-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>
> inode->i_op = &erofs_symlink_iops;
> return 0;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists