[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8vvNHFt818wryyuhWxPtay4czjWXiH=AWEKiJ1AzB46mA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:08:18 +0100
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: dt-bindings: i2c: ovti,ov5640: Drop ref to video-interface-devices.yaml
Hi Laurent,
Thank you for the review.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 12:06 AM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 02:35:21PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > video-interface-devices.yaml isn't used so just drop it from the
> > DT binding doc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5640.yaml | 3 ---
> > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5640.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5640.yaml
> > index 540fd69ac39f..ce99aada75ad 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5640.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5640.yaml
> > @@ -9,9 +9,6 @@ title: OmniVision OV5640 Image Sensor Device Tree Bindings
> > maintainers:
> > - Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>
> >
> > -allOf:
> > - - $ref: /schemas/media/video-interface-devices.yaml#
> > -
>
> The rotation property listed in this binding uses the definition from
> video-interface-devices.yaml. I don't think just dropping this is the
> right solution. Changing additionaProperties to unevaluatedProperties
> seems a better option.
>
Agreed, I missed rotation was used from video-interface-devices.yaml.
Agreed the changing additionaProperties to unevaluatedProperties seems
a better option.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists