[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220919082914.GA290343@elementary>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:29:14 +0200
From: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc: javierm@...hat.com, davidgow@...gle.com, dlatypov@...gle.com,
tzimmermann@...e.de, daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...ux.ie,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
maira.canal@....br, isabbasso@...eup.net, magalilemes00@...il.com,
tales.aparecida@...il.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/format-helper: Add KUnit tests for
drm_fb_xrgb8888_to_gray8()
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:25:19AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:18:01AM +0200, José Expósito wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> >
> > Thanks for looking into the patches.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 09:36:45AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 09:15:31AM +0200, José Expósito wrote:
> > > > Extend the existing test cases to test the conversion from XRGB8888 to
> > > > grayscale.
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>
> > > > Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c
> > > > index 09d358b54da0..71722e828abe 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c
> > > > @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ struct convert_to_xrgb2101010_result {
> > > > const u32 expected[TEST_BUF_SIZE];
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +struct convert_to_gray8_result {
> > > > + unsigned int dst_pitch;
> > > > + const u8 expected[TEST_BUF_SIZE];
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > static struct kunit_case drm_format_helper_test_cases[] = {
> > > > KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_fb_xrgb8888_to_rgb332, convert_xrgb8888_gen_params),
> > > > KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_fb_xrgb8888_to_rgb565, convert_xrgb8888_gen_params),
> > > > KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_fb_xrgb8888_to_rgb888_test, convert_xrgb8888_gen_params),
> > > > KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_fb_xrgb8888_to_xrgb2101010_test, convert_xrgb8888_gen_params),
> > > > + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_fb_xrgb8888_to_gray8_test, convert_xrgb8888_gen_params),
> > >
> > > The trailing test feels redundant,
> >
> > Why do you feel like it is redundant? Under the hood, most conversion
> > functions reuse the same code, but the *_line() function is unique and
> > I think that it is worth testing it.
>
> Sure, I wasn't commenting on the code itself, but the trailing "test" in
> the test name: drm_test_fb_xrgb8888_to_gray8_test
> ^
>
> Which is redundant since we already have "test" in the prefix.
>
> Maxime
Ah! OK, I misunderstood your first sentence. Indeed, the _test sufix
should be removed, added to my TODO list.
Thanks!!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists