[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c537b63f609ae974dfb468ebc31225d45f785e8.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 16:37:44 +0800
From: Jianguo Zhang <jianguo.zhang@...iatek.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Biao Huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] stmmac: dwmac-mediatek: add support for mt8188
Dear Krzysztof,
Thanks for your comments.
On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 10:19 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/09/2022 10:04, Jianguo Zhang wrote:
> > Add ethernet support for MediaTek SoCs from mt8188 family.
> > As mt8188 and mt8195 have same ethernet design, so private data
> > "mt8195_gmac_variant" can be reused for mt8188.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianguo Zhang <jianguo.zhang@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-mediatek.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-mediatek.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-mediatek.c
> > index d42e1afb6521..f45be440b6d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-mediatek.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-mediatek.c
> > @@ -720,6 +720,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> > mediatek_dwmac_match[] = {
> > .data = &mt2712_gmac_variant },
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-gmac",
> > .data = &mt8195_gmac_variant },
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-gmac",
> > + .data = &mt8195_gmac_variant },
>
> It's the same. No need for new entry.
>
mt8188 and mt8195 are different SoCs and we need to distinguish mt8188
from mt8195, so I think a new entry is needed for mt8188 with the
specific "compatiable".
On the other hand, mt8188 and mt8195 have same ethernet design, so the
private data "mt8195_gmac_variant" can be resued to reduce redundant
info in driver.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists