[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YyhH0cENOBZfeu64@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 13:43:29 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
Cc: andrzej.hajda@...el.com, narmstrong@...libre.com, jonas@...boo.se,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
dianders@...omium.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Revert "Revert "drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86:
Implement bridge connector operations for DP""
Hi Rob,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 12:20:08PM +0200, Robert Foss wrote:
> This commit was accidentally reverted instead of another commit, and
> therefore needs to be reinstated.
>
> This reverts commit 8c9c40ec83445b188fb6b59e119bf5c2de81b02d.
>
> Fixes: 8c9c40ec8344 ("Revert "drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement bridge connector operations for DP"")
> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index 6e053e2af229..3c3561942eb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
> #include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
> #include <drm/drm_bridge_connector.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_edid.h>
> #include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
> #include <drm/drm_of.h>
> #include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> @@ -68,6 +69,7 @@
> #define BPP_18_RGB BIT(0)
> #define SN_HPD_DISABLE_REG 0x5C
> #define HPD_DISABLE BIT(0)
> +#define HPD_DEBOUNCED_STATE BIT(4)
> #define SN_GPIO_IO_REG 0x5E
> #define SN_GPIO_INPUT_SHIFT 4
> #define SN_GPIO_OUTPUT_SHIFT 0
> @@ -1158,10 +1160,33 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> pm_runtime_put_sync(pdata->dev);
> }
>
> +static enum drm_connector_status ti_sn_bridge_detect(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> + int val = 0;
> +
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(pdata->dev);
> + regmap_read(pdata->regmap, SN_HPD_DISABLE_REG, &val);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pdata->dev);
> +
> + return val & HPD_DEBOUNCED_STATE ? connector_status_connected
> + : connector_status_disconnected;
> +}
> +
> +static struct edid *ti_sn_bridge_get_edid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> + struct drm_connector *connector)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> +
> + return drm_get_edid(connector, &pdata->aux.ddc);
> +}
> +
> static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ti_sn_bridge_funcs = {
> .attach = ti_sn_bridge_attach,
> .detach = ti_sn_bridge_detach,
> .mode_valid = ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid,
> + .get_edid = ti_sn_bridge_get_edid,
> + .detect = ti_sn_bridge_detect,
> .atomic_pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_pre_enable,
> .atomic_enable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_enable,
> .atomic_disable = ti_sn_bridge_atomic_disable,
> @@ -1257,6 +1282,9 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
> pdata->bridge.type = pdata->next_bridge->type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort
> ? DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort : DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP;
>
> + if (pdata->bridge.type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort)
> + pdata->bridge.ops = DRM_BRIDGE_OP_EDID | DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT;
> +
> drm_bridge_add(&pdata->bridge);
>
> ret = ti_sn_attach_host(pdata);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists