linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kasan: call kasan_malloc() from __kmalloc_*track

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:42:37 +0900
From:   Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kasan: call kasan_malloc() from __kmalloc_*track_caller()

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 07:32:50PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 9/14/22 08:52, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the Cc.
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 07:00:01PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> >> We were failing to call kasan_malloc() from __kmalloc_*track_caller()
> >> which was causing us to sometimes fail to produce KASAN error reports
> >> for allocations made using e.g. devm_kcalloc(), as the KASAN poison was
> >> not being initialized. Fix it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
> >> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.15
> >> ---
> >> The same problem is being fixed upstream in:
> 
> The "upstream" here is now only in -next, not mainline yet, so we still
> have more options at this point.
> 
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220817101826.236819-6-42.hyeyoo@gmail.com/
> >> as part of a larger patch series, but this more targeted fix seems
> >> more suitable for the stable kernel. Hyeonggon, maybe you can add
> >> this patch to the start of your series and it can be picked up
> >> by the stable maintainers.
> ...
> > 
> > Ah, I should have sent it to stable team ;)
> > 
> > I think "Option 3" in Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst will be appropriate,
> > So will resend this after the series goes to Linus's tree.
> 
> I'll pick this for sending to Linus after rc6, which means the series in
> slab.git / -next will afterwards cause a trivial conflict to resolve
> when merging. AFAIK Linus prefers that over late rebasing.
> It will also make it simple for stable.

I think that is better option, thanks!

> 
> > Thank you Peter!
> > 
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Hyeonggon