[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yyhlmq8GA5FnNoxq@feng-clx>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:50:34 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kasan-dev@...glegroups.com" <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab_common: fix possiable double free of kmem_cache
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 05:12:38PM +0800, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 9/19/22 05:12, Feng Tang wrote:
[...]
> > The cause is inside kmem_cache_destroy():
> >
> > kmem_cache_destroy
> > acquire lock/mutex
> > shutdown_cache
> > schedule_work(kmem_cache_release) (if RCU flag set)
> > release lock/mutex
> > kmem_cache_release (if RCU flag set)
>
> ^ not set
>
> I've fixed that up.
Oops.. Thanks for catching it!
> >
> > in some certain timing, the scheduled work could be run before
> > the next RCU flag checking which will get a wrong state.
> >
> > Fix it by caching the RCU flag inside protected area, just like 'refcnt'
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> > ---
> >
> > note:
> >
> > The error only happens on linux-next tree, and not in Linus' tree,
> > which already has Waiman's commit:
> > 0495e337b703 ("mm/slab_common: Deleting kobject in kmem_cache_destroy()
> > without holding slab_mutex/cpu_hotplug_lock")
>
> Actually that commit is already in Linus' rc5 too, so I will send your fix
> this week too. Added a Fixes: 0495e337b703 (...) too.
Got it, thanks
- Feng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists