| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Yyhrva5VH3ERgI8L@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 16:16:45 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@...il.com>
Cc: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@...rulasolutions.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Shawn Tu <shawnx.tu@...el.com>,
Christian Hemp <c.hemp@...tec.de>,
Arec Kao <arec.kao@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Jimmy Su <jimmy.su@...el.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: document OV4689
DT bindings
CC'ing Liam and Mark.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 04:42:25PM +0300, Mikhail Rudenko wrote:
> On 2022-09-16 at 15:15 +02, Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@...rulasolutions.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 11:11:57PM +0300, Mikhail Rudenko wrote:
> >> On 2022-09-13 at 16:05 +02, Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@...rulasolutions.com> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 11:01:34PM +0300, Mikhail Rudenko wrote:
> >> >> Add device-tree binding documentation for OV4689 image sensor driver,
> >> >> and the relevant MAINTAINERS entries.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@...il.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> .../bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov4689.yaml | 141 ++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> >> >> 2 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
> >> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov4689.yaml
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov4689.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov4689.yaml
> >> >> new file mode 100644
> >> >> index 000000000000..376330b5572a
> >> >> --- /dev/null
> >> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov4689.yaml
> >> >> @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
> >> >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >> >> +%YAML 1.2
> >> >> +---
> >> >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/i2c/ovti,ov4689.yaml#
> >> >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >> >> +
> >> >> +title: Omnivision OV4689 CMOS
> >> >> +
> >> >> +maintainers:
> >> >> + - Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@...il.com>
> >> >> +
> >> >> +description: |
> >> >> + The Omnivision OV4689 is a high performance, 1/3-inch, 4 megapixel
> >> >> + image sensor. Ihis chip supports high frame rate speeds up to 90 fps
> >> >> + at 2688x1520 resolution. It is programmable through an I2C
> >> >> + interface, and sensor output is sent via 1/2/4 lane MIPI CSI-2
> >> >> + connection.
> >> >> +
> >> >> +allOf:
> >> >> + - $ref: /schemas/media/video-interface-devices.yaml#
> >> >> +
> >> >> +properties:
> >> >> + compatible:
> >> >> + const: ovti,ov4689
> >> >> +
> >> >> + reg:
> >> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> >> +
> >> >> + clocks:
> >> >> + description:
> >> >> + External clock (XVCLK) for the sensor, 6-64 MHz
> >> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> >> +
> >> >> + clock-names: true
> >> >> +
> >> >> + dovdd-supply:
> >> >> + description:
> >> >> + Digital I/O voltage supply, 1.7-3.0 V
> >> >> +
> >> >> + avdd-supply:
> >> >> + description:
> >> >> + Analog voltage supply, 2.6-3.0 V
> >> >> +
> >> >> + dvdd-supply:
> >> >> + description:
> >> >> + Digital core voltage supply, 1.1-1.3 V
> >> >> +
> >> >> + powerdown-gpios:
> >> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> >> + description:
> >> >> + GPIO connected to the powerdown pin (active low)
> >> >> +
> >> >> + reset-gpios:
> >> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> >> + description:
> >> >> + GPIO connected to the reset pin (active low)
> >> >> +
> >> >> + orientation: true
> >> >> +
> >> >> + rotation: true
> >> >> +
> >> >> + port:
> >> >> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> >> >> + additionalProperties: false
> >> >> + description:
> >> >> + Output port node, single endpoint describing the CSI-2 transmitter
> >> >> +
> >> >> + properties:
> >> >> + endpoint:
> >> >> + $ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml#
> >> >> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> >> >> +
> >> >> + properties:
> >> >> + data-lanes:
> >> >> + oneOf:
> >> >> + - items:
> >> >> + - const: 1
> >> >> + - const: 2
> >> >> + - const: 3
> >> >> + - const: 4
> >> >> + - items:
> >> >> + - const: 1
> >> >> + - const: 2
> >> >> + - items:
> >> >> + - const: 1
> >> >> + link-frequencies: true
> >> >> +
> >> >> + required:
> >> >> + - data-lanes
> >> >> + - link-frequencies
> >> >> +
> >> >> +required:
> >> >> + - compatible
> >> >> + - reg
> >> >> + - clocks
> >> >> + - clock-names
> >> >> + - dovdd-supply
> >> >> + - avdd-supply
> >> >> + - dvdd-supply
> >> >> + - powerdown-gpios
> >> >> + - reset-gpios
> >> >> + - port
> >> >
> >> > I think we don't need all of these entries as required.
> >> > The only let me say "really" required are:
> >> >
> >> > - compatible
> >> > - reg
> >> > - clocks
> >> > - port
> >>
> >> Thanks for the review! I agree that the driver may be modified to work
> >> without powerdown and reset gpios and they are not required for sensor
> >> operation. On contrary, supplies are obviously required. Of course, linux
> >> provides dummy regulators if supplies are missing from device tree, but
> >> I though the intention was to document hardware, not implementation
> >> details. What do think of this?
> >
> > We have already discuss on this on the following thread sometimes ago :)
> >
> > https://www.patchwork.linux-fancy.com/project/linux-fancy/patch/20220630134835.592521-6-tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com/
> >
> > Take a look and let me know.
>
> Okay, if there already is a consensus regarding this matter, I'll make
> the regulators optional in v3.
I always request the opposite during reviews :-)
Could we get an authoritative answer from the maintainers of the
regulator framework on this question, and document it somewhere ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists