| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHQZ30C3AhB4avt2--Wz5b0NpwCRP80QybE9J6cCqq24Zx5rZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:38:51 -0600
From: Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"jingle.wu" <jingle.wu@....com.tw>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Tim Van Patten <timvp@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
"open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] i2c: acpi: Use ACPI wake capability bit to set wake_irq
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 3:54 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 05:57:55PM -0600, Raul E Rangel wrote:
> > Device tree already has a mechanism to pass the wake_irq. It does this
> > by looking for the wakeup-source property and setting the
> > I2C_CLIENT_WAKE flag. This CL adds the ACPI equivalent. It uses the
> > ACPI interrupt wake flag to determine if the interrupt can be used to
> > wake the system. Previously the i2c drivers had to make assumptions and
> > blindly enable the wake IRQ. This can cause spurious wake events. e.g.,
> > If there is a device with an Active Low interrupt and the device gets
> > powered off while suspending, the interrupt line will go low since it's
> > no longer powered and wakes the system. For this reason we should
> > respect the board designers wishes and honor the wake bit defined on the
> > interrupt.
>
> Okay, let's go with this variant, but I'm afraid that in time we may come up
> to the proposed (generic structure for ACPI IRQ parameters which can be used
> in a few places).
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Convert wake_capable to bool
> > - Only update wake_capable pointer once
> > - Move wake_capable local into local block
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Look at wake_cabple bit for IRQ/Interrupt resources
> >
> > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 8 +++++++-
> > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h | 4 ++--
> > 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> > index c762a879c4cc6b..b3d68a9659ff4f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> > @@ -137,6 +137,11 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_acpi_ignored_device_ids[] = {
> > {}
> > };
> >
> > +struct i2c_acpi_irq_context {
> > + int irq;
> > + bool wake_capable;
> > +};
> > +
> > static int i2c_acpi_do_lookup(struct acpi_device *adev,
> > struct i2c_acpi_lookup *lookup)
> > {
> > @@ -170,11 +175,14 @@ static int i2c_acpi_do_lookup(struct acpi_device *adev,
> >
> > static int i2c_acpi_add_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> > {
> > - int *irq = data;
> > + struct i2c_acpi_irq_context *irq_ctx = data;
> > struct resource r;
> >
> > - if (*irq <= 0 && acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(ares, 0, &r))
> > - *irq = i2c_dev_irq_from_resources(&r, 1);
> > + if (irq_ctx->irq <= 0 && acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(ares, 0, &r)) {
> > + irq_ctx->irq = i2c_dev_irq_from_resources(&r, 1);
> > + irq_ctx->wake_capable =
> > + !!(r.flags & IORESOURCE_IRQ_WAKECAPABLE);
> > + }
>
> Maybe
>
> if (irq_ctx->irq > 0)
> return 1;
>
> if (!acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(ares, 0, &r))
> return 1;
>
> irq_ctx->irq = i2c_dev_irq_from_resources(&r, 1);
> irq_ctx->wake_capable = !!(r.flags & IORESOURCE_IRQ_WAKECAPABLE);
>
> ?
>
> > return 1; /* No need to add resource to the list */
> > }
>
Done
> Also not sure why the callback is not called i2c_acpi_add_irq_resource().
> But it probably can be done in a separate change.
>
I had the same thought. I went ahead and added it into this change
since I already
refactored the logic like you suggested above.
> > @@ -182,31 +190,38 @@ static int i2c_acpi_add_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> > /**
> > * i2c_acpi_get_irq - get device IRQ number from ACPI
> > * @client: Pointer to the I2C client device
> > + * @wake_capable: Set to true if the IRQ is wake capable
> > *
> > * Find the IRQ number used by a specific client device.
> > *
> > * Return: The IRQ number or an error code.
> > */
> > -int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client)
> > +int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, bool *wake_capable)
> > {
> > struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&client->dev);
> > struct list_head resource_list;
> > - int irq = -ENOENT;
> > + struct i2c_acpi_irq_context irq_ctx = {
> > + .irq = -ENOENT,
> > + };
> > int ret;
> >
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
> >
> > ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
> > - i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq);
> > + i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq_ctx);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
> >
> > - if (irq == -ENOENT)
> > - irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(adev, 0);
> > + if (irq_ctx.irq == -ENOENT)
> > + irq_ctx.irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_wake_get(adev, 0,
> > + &irq_ctx.wake_capable);
> > +
> > + if (wake_capable)
> > + *wake_capable = irq_ctx.wake_capable;
> >
> > - return irq;
> > + return irq_ctx.irq;
> > }
> >
> > static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> > index 91007558bcb260..c4debd46c6340f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> > @@ -487,8 +487,14 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
> > if (irq == -EINVAL || irq == -ENODATA)
> > irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
> > } else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
> > - irq = i2c_acpi_get_irq(client);
> > + bool wake_capable;
> > +
> > + irq = i2c_acpi_get_irq(client, &wake_capable);
>
> > +
>
> Unneeded blank line.
>
Done
> > + if (irq > 0 && wake_capable)
> > + client->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_WAKE;
> > }
>
> > +
>
> Ditto. (This even looks like a stray change)
>
Done
> > if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> > status = irq;
> > goto put_sync_adapter;
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
> > index 87e2c914f1c57b..1247e6e6e97517 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
> > @@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ static inline int __i2c_check_suspended(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > void i2c_acpi_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap);
> >
> > -int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client);
> > +int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, bool *wake_capable);
> > #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
> > static inline void i2c_acpi_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap) { }
> >
> > -static inline int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client)
> > +static inline int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, bool *wake_capable)
> > {
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.37.3.968.ga6b4b080e4-goog
> >
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
I'll send out a V4 series in a few minutes with all the latest changes.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists