linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] fuse: In fuse_flush only wait if someone wants the return code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wn9z1i5b.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:46:40 -0500
From:   "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To:     Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] fuse: In fuse_flush only wait if someone wants
 the return code

Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 12:10:33AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Al, vfs folks? (igrab/iput sorted so as not to be distractions).
>
> Any movement on this? Can you resend (or I can) the patch with the
> fixes for fuse at the very least?

Sorry for not replying earlier.  Thank you for taking this.

I had really meant to suggest something like that.  At the moment I have
a bit too much on my plate, so I am glad to see this moving forward.

I am a bit sad that I didn't succeed in starting a general vfs
discussion about this.  Oh well.  As long as we get weird bugs
like this fixed.

Eric