linux-kernel - Re: Linux 6.0-rc6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220919040653.GA1840059@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:06:53 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Csókás Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.0-rc6

On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 01:56:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So this is an artificially small -rc release, because this past week
> we had the Maintainers' Summit in Dublin (along with OSS EU and LPC
> 2022), so we've had a lot of maintainers traveling.
> 
> Or - putting my ridiculously optimistic hat on - maybe things are just
> so nice and stable that there just weren't all that many fixes?
> 
> Yeah, I know which scenario I'm betting on, but hope springs eternal.
> 
> Regardless, things look fine. I am expecting rc7 to be larger than
> usual due to pull requests having shifted one week later, and in the
> worst case that might mean that I might feel like we need an extra
> rc8, but for now I'm going to assume it's not going to be _that_
> noticeable and hope we'll just keep to the regular schedule.
> 
> But it would be lovely if everybody gave this some extra tender loving
> care in the form of extra testing...
> 

Build results:
	total: 149 pass: 149 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 490 pass: 489 fail: 1
Failed tests:
	mcf5208evb:m5208:m5208evb_defconfig:initrd

TL;DR: Patches / reverts needed to fix known regressions

Revert "net: fec: Use a spinlock to guard `fep->ptp_clk_on`"
Revert "fec: Restart PPS after link state change"
    revert b353b241f1eb
    revert f79959220fa5
    Rationale:
	The patches result in various tracebacks and crashes.
	https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220827160922.642zlcd5foopozru@pengutronix.de/

The need to revert those patches has been discussed repeatedly,
so going into details seems pointless.

Guenter