linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block/blk-rq-qos: delete useless enmu RQ_QOS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:38:32 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:     Li Jinlin <lijinlin3@...wei.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linfeilong@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block/blk-rq-qos: delete useless enmu RQ_QOS_IOPRIO

On 9/16/22 14:58, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 16-09-22 07:12:23, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Jan, please Cc me on future blk-ioprio patches - I just noticed that I was
>> not Cc-ed on commit 82b74cac2849 ("blk-ioprio: Convert from rqos policy to
>> direct call").
> 
> Well, you were on CC of the whole patchset which this patch was part of - see
> [1]. So maybe you've missed it among other patches.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220623074450.30550-1-jack@suse.cz/

Hi Jan,

Hmm, you are right. Looking back at that patch series, what I remember 
is that I looked at the first two patches, noticed that these were 
outside my area of expertise and skipped the other patches. I will pay 
more attention in the future.

Bart.