linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next] drm/amd/pm: Remove unneeded result variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADnq5_PB=z9JeVV4c1YC6hbAXXvHPLbD=kZvOyS1QxR-WMU9Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:11:19 -0400
From:   Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To:     cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc:     alexander.deucher@....com, airlied@...ux.ie,
        ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>, Xinhui.Pan@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, evan.quan@....com,
        christian.koenig@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] drm/amd/pm: Remove unneeded result variable

Applied.  Thanks!

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 2:36 AM <cgel.zte@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
>
> Return the value atomctrl_initialize_mc_reg_table_v2_2() directly instead
> of storing it in another redundant variable.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/polaris10_smumgr.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/polaris10_smumgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/polaris10_smumgr.c
> index 45214a364baa..e7ed2a7adf8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/polaris10_smumgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/polaris10_smumgr.c
> @@ -2567,15 +2567,13 @@ static uint8_t polaris10_get_memory_modile_index(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
>
>  static int polaris10_initialize_mc_reg_table(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
>  {
> -       int result;
>         struct polaris10_smumgr *smu_data = (struct polaris10_smumgr *)(hwmgr->smu_backend);
>         pp_atomctrl_mc_reg_table *mc_reg_table = &smu_data->mc_reg_table;
>         uint8_t module_index = polaris10_get_memory_modile_index(hwmgr);
>
>         memset(mc_reg_table, 0, sizeof(pp_atomctrl_mc_reg_table));
> -       result = atomctrl_initialize_mc_reg_table_v2_2(hwmgr, module_index, mc_reg_table);
>
> -       return result;
> +       return atomctrl_initialize_mc_reg_table_v2_2(hwmgr, module_index, mc_reg_table);
>  }
>
>  static bool polaris10_is_dpm_running(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
> --
> 2.25.1