[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35fd816-d755-967-5712-b5496875ac7a@vosn.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:23:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Nikolaus Voss <nv@...n.de>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yael Tzur <yaelt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: encrypted: fix key instantiation with user-provided
data
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 07:45 +0200, Nikolaus Voss wrote:
>> Commit cd3bc044af48 ("KEYS: encrypted: Instantiate key with user-provided
>> decrypted data") added key instantiation with user provided decrypted data.
>> The user data is hex-ascii-encoded but was just memcpy'ed to the binary buffer.
>> Fix this to use hex2bin instead.
>
> Thanks, Nikolaus. We iterated a number of times over what would be the
> safest userspace input. One of the last changes was that the key data
> should be hex-ascii-encoded. Unfortunately, the LTP
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/keyctl09.c example isn't hex-ascii-encoded
> and the example in Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst
> just cat's a file. Both expect the length to be the length of the
> userspace provided data. With this patch, when hex2bin() fails, there
> is no explanation.
That's true. But it's true for all occurrences of hex2bin() in this file.
I could pr_err() an explanation, improve the trusted-encrypted.rst example
and respin the patch. Should I, or do you have another suggestion?
I wasn't aware of keyctl09.c, but quickly looking into it, the user data
_is_ hex-ascii-encoded, only the length is "wrong": Imho, the specified
length should be the binary length as this is consistent with key-length
specs in other cases (e.g. when loading the key from a blob).
keyctl09.c could be easy to fix, if only the length is modified. Should
I propose a patch? What is the correct/appropriate workflow there?
Thanks,
Niko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists