linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf test: Skip wp modify test on old kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2022 21:12:57 +0100
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Skip wp modify test on old kernels

Em Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 11:24:05AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> On 15-Sep-22 12:03 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > It uses PERF_EVENT_IOC_MODIFY_ATTRIBUTES ioctl. The kernel would return
> > ENOTTY if it's not supported.  Update the skip reason in that case.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> > I'd like to add Fixes: 2e85d5979e8d tag here but it'd conlict with the
> > later change in e47c6ecaae1d.
> 
> Is it worth to backport?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ravi

-- 

- Arnaldo