[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1663645034-967-3-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 11:37:12 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] LoongArch: Add kretprobe support
Use the generic kretprobe trampoline handler to add kretprobe
support for LoongArch.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
---
arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
index 6b01073..5f8503a 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ config LOONGARCH
select HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK
select HAVE_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
select HAVE_KPROBES
+ select HAVE_KRETPROBES
select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
select HAVE_NMI
select HAVE_PCI
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c
index b2c73a5..8c3efe5 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -303,7 +303,54 @@ int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_exceptions_notify);
+/*
+ * For function-return probes, init_kprobes() establishes a probepoint
+ * here. When a retprobed function returns, this probe is hit and
+ * trampoline_probe_handler() runs, calling the kretprobe's handler.
+ */
+static void __used kretprobe_trampoline_holder(void)
+{
+ asm volatile(".global __kretprobe_trampoline\n"
+ "__kretprobe_trampoline:\n"
+ "nop\n");
+}
+
+/* Called when the probe at kretprobe trampoline is hit */
+static int trampoline_probe_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ instruction_pointer(regs) = __kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, NULL);
+ /*
+ * By returning a non-zero value, we are telling
+ * kprobe_handler() that we don't want the post_handler
+ * to run (and have re-enabled preemption)
+ */
+ return 1;
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(trampoline_probe_handler);
+
+static struct kprobe trampoline_p = {
+ .addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)__kretprobe_trampoline,
+ .pre_handler = trampoline_probe_handler
+};
+
+void arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->regs[1];
+ ri->fp = NULL;
+
+ /* Replace the return addr with trampoline addr */
+ regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)__kretprobe_trampoline;
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_prepare_kretprobe);
+
+int arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+ return p->addr == trampoline_p.addr;
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_trampoline_kprobe);
+
int __init arch_init_kprobes(void)
{
- return 0;
+ return register_kprobe(&trampoline_p);
}
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists