[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yyk/b29aG2ivpkf5@google.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 21:19:59 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Yunlong Jia <yunlong.jia@....corp-partner.google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Henry Sun <henrysun@...gle.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Bob Moragues <moragues@...omium.org>,
Yunlong Jia <yunlong.jia@....com.tw>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Johnny Chuang <johnny.chuang.emc@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] input: touchscreen: elants_i2c: Add eth3915n
touchscreen chip
Hi Yunlong,
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 10:27:55AM +0000, Yunlong Jia wrote:
> The eth3915n requires more delay time than the eth3500 when poweron
> & reset.
> Define EKTH3915_POWERON_DELAY_MSEC as the poweron delay time of eth3915n,
> about 80ms.
> Define EKTH3915_RESET_DELAY_MSEC as the reset delay time of eth3915n,
> about 300ms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Jia <yunlong.jia@....com.tw>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> 1. Add poweron delay time.
This materially changes the patch so I do not believe you should have
kept Doug's reviewed-by tag. I also do not understand what this delay is
for. Is this the minimal time for the reset line to stay high? Something
else?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists