linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/efs/inode.c: use __func_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2022 08:37:13 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Jiangshan Yi <13667453960@....com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        willy@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiangshan Yi <yijiangshan@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/efs/inode.c: use __func__ instead of function name

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 01:24:26AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:33:14AM +0800, Jiangshan Yi wrote:
> > From: Jiangshan Yi <yijiangshan@...inos.cn>
> > 
> > It is better to use __func__ instead of function name.
> 
> 	Why is it better?  And why is it *not* sent to (active)
> maintainers of fs/erofs?  I'm not going to apply that behind their
> backs and I would ask akpm to abstain from taking that one.

It's efs although it also starts with letter e and ends with fs ;).
I have no idea who actually takes care of it now.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang