[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220920052049.20507-6-jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:20:45 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 05/10] tty: serial: extract tx_ready() from __serial_lpc32xx_tx()
The condition in __serial_lpc32xx_tx()'s loop is barely readable.
Extract it to a separate function. This will make the cleanup in the
next patches easier too.
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
Notes:
[v4] this is new in v4 -- extracted as a separate change
drivers/tty/serial/lpc32xx_hs.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/lpc32xx_hs.c b/drivers/tty/serial/lpc32xx_hs.c
index 0d5ef7df27d0..ed47f4768338 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/lpc32xx_hs.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/lpc32xx_hs.c
@@ -278,6 +278,13 @@ static void __serial_lpc32xx_rx(struct uart_port *port)
static void serial_lpc32xx_stop_tx(struct uart_port *port);
+static bool serial_lpc32xx_tx_ready(struct uart_port *port)
+{
+ u32 level = readl(LPC32XX_HSUART_LEVEL(port->membase));
+
+ return LPC32XX_HSU_TX_LEV(level) < 64;
+}
+
static void __serial_lpc32xx_tx(struct uart_port *port)
{
struct circ_buf *xmit = &port->state->xmit;
@@ -293,8 +300,7 @@ static void __serial_lpc32xx_tx(struct uart_port *port)
goto exit_tx;
/* Transfer data */
- while (LPC32XX_HSU_TX_LEV(readl(
- LPC32XX_HSUART_LEVEL(port->membase))) < 64) {
+ while (serial_lpc32xx_tx_ready(port)) {
writel((u32) xmit->buf[xmit->tail],
LPC32XX_HSUART_FIFO(port->membase));
xmit->tail = (xmit->tail + 1) & (UART_XMIT_SIZE - 1);
--
2.37.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists