[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YylduXa12mtakuHT@wendy>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:29:13 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v-mc tree with Linus' tree
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 05:19:05AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the risc-v-mc tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
>
> between commits:
>
> 3f67e6997603 ("riscv: dts: microchip: mpfs: fix incorrect pcie child node name")
> e4009c5fa77b ("riscv: dts: microchip: mpfs: remove pci axi address translation property")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 2ad0883d86c8 ("riscv: dts: microchip: move the mpfs' pci node to -fabric.dtsi")
>
> from the risc-v-mc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter change seems to include the other 2) and can
Yup, I test merged it after applying and that was my resolution too.
Thanks Stephen.
> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists