linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next] selftests: timers: Remove the unneeded result variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yylv5hbSBejJ58nt@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:46:46 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc:     shuah@...nel.org, jstultz@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        sboyd@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] selftests: timers: Remove the unneeded result
 variable

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 06:32:02AM +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
> 
> Return the value adjtimex() directly instead of storing it in another
> redundant variable.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>

Once again, as this seems to keep being forgotten, you are sending
multiple patches all from the same gmail.com account, yet are claiming
they are from different people from a company that no one from that
company has agreed is actually at that company.

Then there's the whole "ignoring
Documentation/process/researcher-guidelines.rst" issues, which would
disqualify the changes anyway.

So we can not take these patches at all.

Please fix up your corporate email structures so that you can properly
submit changes to the kernel that can be verified to actually come from
your company.  Otherwise they can not be accepted at all for obvious
reasons (ZTE would not want to have people claiming to work for them
that are not actually working for them, right?)

thanks,

greg k-h