[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b8eb1d8-a8ae-d57f-559f-5e9d0fc981b9@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:25:54 +0200
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Cc: nrb@...ux.ibm.com, pmorel@...ux.ibm.com, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com,
farman@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: pci: fix GAIT physical vs virtual pointers
usage
On 9/7/22 17:59, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> The GAIT and all of its entries must be represented by physical
> addresses as this structure is shared with underlying firmware.
> We can keep a virtual address of the GAIT origin in order to
> handle processing in the kernel, but when traversing the entries
> we must again convert the physical AISB stored in that GAIT entry
> into a virtual address in order to process it.
>
> Note: this currently doesn't fix a real bug, since virtual addresses
> are indentical to physical ones.
>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
Thanks, applied
Powered by blists - more mailing lists