[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220920084648.GA17087@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:46:48 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gwendal@...omium.org,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@...ora.tech>, jarkko@...nel.org,
zohar@...ux.ibm.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
apronin@...omium.org, dlunev@...gle.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Hao Wu <hao.wu@...rik.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@...gle.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, axelj <axelj@...s.com>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Encrypted Hibernation
Hi!
> We are exploring enabling hibernation in some new scenarios. However,
> our security team has a few requirements, listed below:
> 1. The hibernate image must be encrypted with protection derived from
> both the platform (eg TPM) and user authentication data (eg
> password).
> 2. Hibernation must not be a vector by which a malicious userspace can
> escalate to the kernel.
Why is #2 reasonable requirement?
We normally allow userspace with appropriate permissions to update the
kernel, for example.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
People of Russia, stop Putin before his war on Ukraine escalates.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists