[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00dd028f-d636-0cda-40ce-01d5addcbec9@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:27:20 +0530
From: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: agross@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, thara.gopinath@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
bhupesh.linux@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de, Jordan Crouse <jorcrous@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4 RESEND] ARM: dts: qcom: Use new compatibles for
crypto nodes
On 9/20/22 12:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/09/2022 00:15, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>> Since we are using soc specific qce crypto IP compatibles
>> in the bindings now, use the same in the device tree files
>> which include the crypto nodes.
>>
>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> Tested-by: Jordan Crouse <jorcrous@...zon.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 +-
>> 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi
>> index b23591110bd2..9c40714562d5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi
>> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ cryptobam: dma-controller@...4000 {
>> };
>>
>> crypto: crypto@...a000 {
>> - compatible = "qcom,crypto-v5.1";
>> + compatible = "qcom,ipq4019-qce";
>
> There are few issues here:
> 1. Compatible is not documented.
Its documented here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/30756e6f-952f-ccf2-b493-e515ba4f0a64@linaro.org/
[as mentioned in the dependency section in the cover letter :)]
> 2. Compatible is not supported by old kernel - ABI break.
> 3. Everything won't be bisectable...
I think its a question of dependencies b/w the patchsets intended for
separate areas. Let me think more on how, I can resolve it in newer
versions.
Thanks,
Bhupesh
> The same in other places.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists