| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAGjdHukQHkPy_wt8igpLCxTJWeEUY9HzbKtfiEDueJrOvxaVxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:43:18 +0800
From: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu1987@...il.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, damon@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/damon: deduplicate damon_{reclaim,lru_sort}_apply_parameters()
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 12:56 AM SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Kaixu,
>
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:28:09 +0800 xiakaixu1987@...il.com wrote:
>
> > From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>
> >
> > The bodies of damon_{reclaim,lru_sort}_apply_parameters() contain
> > duplicates.
>
> Good finding!
>
> > This commit add a common function
> > damon_set_regions_from_system_ram() to removes the duplicates.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/damon.h | 3 ++-
> > mm/damon/core.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > mm/damon/lru_sort.c | 13 +++----------
> > mm/damon/reclaim.c | 13 +++----------
> > 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
> > index e7808a84675f..2fd05568ef45 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/damon.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/damon.h
> > @@ -557,7 +557,8 @@ static inline bool damon_target_has_pid(const struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> > int damon_start(struct damon_ctx **ctxs, int nr_ctxs, bool exclusive);
> > int damon_stop(struct damon_ctx **ctxs, int nr_ctxs);
> >
> > -bool damon_find_biggest_system_ram(unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end);
> > +int damon_set_regions_from_system_ram(struct damon_target *t,
> > + unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end);
> >
> > #endif /* CONFIG_DAMON */
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> > index 9c80c6eb00c2..d967b2805a53 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> > @@ -1245,7 +1245,8 @@ static int walk_system_ram(struct resource *res, void *arg)
> > * Find biggest 'System RAM' resource and store its start and end address in
> > * @start and @end, respectively. If no System RAM is found, returns false.
> > */
> > -bool damon_find_biggest_system_ram(unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end)
> > +static bool damon_find_biggest_system_ram(unsigned long *start,
> > + unsigned long *end)
> >
> > {
> > struct damon_system_ram_region arg = {};
> > @@ -1259,6 +1260,23 @@ bool damon_find_biggest_system_ram(unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +int damon_set_regions_from_system_ram(struct damon_target *t,
> > + unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end)
> > +{
> > + struct damon_addr_range addr_range;
> > +
> > + if (*start > *end)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (!*start && !*end &&
> > + !damon_find_biggest_system_ram(start, end))
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> This function sets the region as biggest system ram only if both *start and
> *end are zero. The name should be changed, and it would better to have a
> kernel doc comment as the behavior is not very simple. How about below?
>
> /**
> * damon_set_region_biggest_system_ram_default() - Set the region of the given
> * monitoring target as requested, or biggest 'System RAM'.
> * @t: The monitoring target to set the region.
> * @start: The pointer to the start address of the region.
> * @end: The pointer to the end address of the region.
> *
> * This function sets the region of @t as requested by @start and @end. If the
> * values of the two pointers are pointing to are zero, however, this function
> * finds the biggest 'System RAM' resource and set the region to cover the
> * resource. In the latter case, this function saves the start and end address
> * of the resource in @start and @end, respectively.
> *
> * Return: 0 on success, negative error code otherwise.
> */
>
Thanks for your detailed comments! I'll follow that in the next version.
Thanks,
Kaixu
> > +
> > + addr_range.start = *start;
> > + addr_range.end = *end;
> > + return damon_set_regions(t, &addr_range, 1);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int __init damon_init(void)
> > {
> > damon_region_cache = KMEM_CACHE(damon_region, 0);
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/lru_sort.c b/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> > index d7eb72b41cb6..0276cbec632a 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> > @@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ static struct damos *damon_lru_sort_new_cold_scheme(unsigned int cold_thres)
> > static int damon_lru_sort_apply_parameters(void)
> > {
> > struct damos *scheme;
> > - struct damon_addr_range addr_range;
> > unsigned int hot_thres, cold_thres;
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > @@ -211,15 +210,9 @@ static int damon_lru_sort_apply_parameters(void)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > damon_add_scheme(ctx, scheme);
> >
> > - if (monitor_region_start > monitor_region_end)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - if (!monitor_region_start && !monitor_region_end &&
> > - !damon_find_biggest_system_ram(&monitor_region_start,
> > - &monitor_region_end))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - addr_range.start = monitor_region_start;
> > - addr_range.end = monitor_region_end;
> > - return damon_set_regions(target, &addr_range, 1);
> > + return damon_set_regions_from_system_ram(target,
> > + &monitor_region_start,
> > + &monitor_region_end);
> > }
> >
> > static int damon_lru_sort_turn(bool on)
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > index 3d59ab11b7b3..6297e1799190 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > @@ -144,7 +144,6 @@ static struct damos *damon_reclaim_new_scheme(void)
> > static int damon_reclaim_apply_parameters(void)
> > {
> > struct damos *scheme;
> > - struct damon_addr_range addr_range;
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > err = damon_set_attrs(ctx, &damon_reclaim_mon_attrs);
> > @@ -157,15 +156,9 @@ static int damon_reclaim_apply_parameters(void)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > damon_set_schemes(ctx, &scheme, 1);
> >
> > - if (monitor_region_start > monitor_region_end)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - if (!monitor_region_start && !monitor_region_end &&
> > - !damon_find_biggest_system_ram(&monitor_region_start,
> > - &monitor_region_end))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - addr_range.start = monitor_region_start;
> > - addr_range.end = monitor_region_end;
> > - return damon_set_regions(target, &addr_range, 1);
> > + return damon_set_regions_from_system_ram(target,
> > + &monitor_region_start,
> > + &monitor_region_end);
> > }
> >
> > static int damon_reclaim_turn(bool on)
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists