[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52d9339e-d9da-3813-fdbd-196c978d9c09@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:16:50 +0530
From: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC: <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
<treding@...dia.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bbasu@...dia.com>,
<sanjayc@...dia.com>, <ksitaraman@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] cpufreq: tegra239: Add support for T239
Hi Thierry,
Thankyou for the review.
I will do the change and send v2 soon.
Regards,
Sumit Gupta
On 15/09/22 17:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Subject:
> Re: [Patch] cpufreq: tegra239: Add support for T239
> From:
> Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> Date:
> 15/09/22, 17:51
>
> To:
> Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
> CC:
> viresh.kumar@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org, treding@...dia.com,
> jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
> linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
> bbasu@...dia.com, sanjayc@...dia.com, ksitaraman@...dia.com
>
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> ForwardedMessage.eml
>
> Subject:
> Re: [Patch] cpufreq: tegra239: Add support for T239
> From:
> Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> Date:
> 15/09/22, 17:51
>
> To:
> Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
> CC:
> viresh.kumar@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org, treding@...dia.com,
> jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
> linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
> bbasu@...dia.com, sanjayc@...dia.com, ksitaraman@...dia.com
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 09:27:59PM +0530, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>> Adding support for Tegra239 SoC which has eight cores in
>> a single cluster. Also, moving num_clusters to soc data
>> to avoid over allocating memory for four clusters always.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta<sumitg@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> The subject is a little confusing. Typically the prefix refers to the
> driver, so it would be something like "cpufreq: tegra194: ".
>
> Furthermore, please always spell out Tegra239 for consistency. This
> makes it easier to grep for.
>
> Otherwise, looks good. So with the above fixed, this is:
>
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding<treding@...dia.com>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
>> index 1216046cf4c2..f38a760da61b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -38,14 +38,6 @@
>> /* cpufreq transisition latency */
>> #define TEGRA_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_LATENCY (300 * 1000) /* unit in nanoseconds */
>>
>> -enum cluster {
>> - CLUSTER0,
>> - CLUSTER1,
>> - CLUSTER2,
>> - CLUSTER3,
>> - MAX_CLUSTERS,
>> -};
>> -
>> struct tegra_cpu_ctr {
>> u32 cpu;
>> u32 coreclk_cnt, last_coreclk_cnt;
>> @@ -67,12 +59,12 @@ struct tegra_cpufreq_ops {
>> struct tegra_cpufreq_soc {
>> struct tegra_cpufreq_ops *ops;
>> int maxcpus_per_cluster;
>> + size_t num_clusters;
>> phys_addr_t actmon_cntr_base;
>> };
>>
>> struct tegra194_cpufreq_data {
>> void __iomem *regs;
>> - size_t num_clusters;
>> struct cpufreq_frequency_table **tables;
>> const struct tegra_cpufreq_soc *soc;
>> };
>> @@ -166,6 +158,14 @@ static const struct tegra_cpufreq_soc tegra234_cpufreq_soc = {
>> .ops = &tegra234_cpufreq_ops,
>> .actmon_cntr_base = 0x9000,
>> .maxcpus_per_cluster = 4,
>> + .num_clusters = 3,
>> +};
>> +
>> +const struct tegra_cpufreq_soc tegra239_cpufreq_soc = {
>> + .ops = &tegra234_cpufreq_ops,
>> + .actmon_cntr_base = 0x4000,
>> + .maxcpus_per_cluster = 8,
>> + .num_clusters = 1,
>> };
>>
>> static void tegra194_get_cpu_cluster_id(u32 cpu, u32 *cpuid, u32 *clusterid)
>> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int tegra194_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>
>> data->soc->ops->get_cpu_cluster_id(policy->cpu, NULL, &clusterid);
>>
>> - if (clusterid >= data->num_clusters || !data->tables[clusterid])
>> + if (clusterid >= data->soc->num_clusters || !data->tables[clusterid])
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> start_cpu = rounddown(policy->cpu, maxcpus_per_cluster);
>> @@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ static struct tegra_cpufreq_ops tegra194_cpufreq_ops = {
>> static const struct tegra_cpufreq_soc tegra194_cpufreq_soc = {
>> .ops = &tegra194_cpufreq_ops,
>> .maxcpus_per_cluster = 2,
>> + .num_clusters = 4,
>> };
>>
>> static void tegra194_cpufreq_free_resources(void)
>> @@ -525,15 +526,14 @@ static int tegra194_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> soc = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>>
>> - if (soc->ops && soc->maxcpus_per_cluster) {
>> + if (soc->ops && soc->maxcpus_per_cluster && soc->num_clusters) {
>> data->soc = soc;
>> } else {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "soc data missing\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - data->num_clusters = MAX_CLUSTERS;
>> - data->tables = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, data->num_clusters,
>> + data->tables = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, data->soc->num_clusters,
>> sizeof(*data->tables), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!data->tables)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static int tegra194_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> goto put_bpmp;
>> }
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < data->num_clusters; i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < data->soc->num_clusters; i++) {
>> data->tables[i] = init_freq_table(pdev, bpmp, i);
>> if (IS_ERR(data->tables[i])) {
>> err = PTR_ERR(data->tables[i]);
>> @@ -590,6 +590,7 @@ static int tegra194_cpufreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> static const struct of_device_id tegra194_cpufreq_of_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra194-ccplex", .data = &tegra194_cpufreq_soc },
>> { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra234-ccplex-cluster", .data = &tegra234_cpufreq_soc },
>> + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra239-ccplex-cluster", .data = &tegra239_cpufreq_soc },
>> { /* sentinel */ }
>> };
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
> Attachments:
>
> ForwardedMessage.eml 10.5 KB
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists