[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACO55ts7rpbyYv3ovWt1iCfkGsChCUVitmHqtzAwFpfbPEZGYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:36:32 +0200
From: Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Computer Enthusiastic <computer.enthusiastic@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nouveau: explicitly wait on the fence in nouveau_bo_move_m2mf
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 12:42 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 10:09:28PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote:
> > It is a bit unlcear to us why that's helping, but it does and unbreaks
> > suspend/resume on a lot of GPUs without any known drawbacks.
> >
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.15+
> > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/156
> > Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > index 35bb0bb3fe61..126b3c6e12f9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > @@ -822,6 +822,15 @@ nouveau_bo_move_m2mf(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, int evict,
> > if (ret == 0) {
> > ret = nouveau_fence_new(chan, false, &fence);
> > if (ret == 0) {
> > + /* TODO: figure out a better solution here
> > + *
> > + * wait on the fence here explicitly as going through
> > + * ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup somehow doesn't seem to do it.
> > + *
> > + * Without this the operation can timeout and we'll fallback to a
> > + * software copy, which might take several minutes to finish.
> > + */
> > + nouveau_fence_wait(fence, false, false);
> > ret = ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup(bo,
> > &fence->base,
> > evict, false,
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >
> >
>
> While this is marked for 5.15+ only, a user in Debian was seeing the
> suspend issue as well on 5.10.y and did confirm the commit fixes the
> issue as well in the 5.10.y series:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989705#69
>
> Karol, Lyude, should that as well be picked for 5.10.y?
>
mhh from the original report 5.10 was fine, but maybe something got
backported and it broke it? I'll try to do some testing on my machine
and see what I can figure out, but it could also be a debian only
issue at this point.
> Regards,
> Salvatore
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists