[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7582e9e9-4558-ac33-a0f8-cb4e69d0628e@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 19:30:19 +0000
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>,
Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>,
Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: Add KX022A accelerometer
Hi dee Ho Krzysztof,
Thanks for looking through this!
On 9/21/22 22:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/09/2022 13:45, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
>> KX022A is a 3-axis Accelerometer from ROHM/Kionix. The senor features
>> include variable ODRs, I2C and SPI control, FIFO/LIFO with watermark IRQ,
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
My own comment - switch the email to the gmail-one. Company mail is
unreliable at best..
>> +
>> +description: |
>> + KX022A is a 3-axis accelerometer supporting +/- 2G, 4G, 8G and 16G ranges,
>> + output data-rates from 0.78Hz to 1600Hz and a hardware-fifo buffering.
>> + KX022A can be accessed either via I2C or SPI.
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + compatible: kionix,kx022a
>
> Missing const. I wonder how did it pass testing...
I originally had
oneOf:
items const ...
construct here as I had separate compatibles for *-spi and *-i2c. I am
unsure if I remembered to run the tests after dropping the extra
compatibles :| - Sorry! I'll fix this.
>> + io_vdd-supply: true
>
> No underscores, so io-vdd-supply
The rationale behind the underscore is that the data-sheet uses terms
vdd and vdd_io (with underscore). I wanted to match the supply name to
what is used in the data-sheet. Not a big thing but I'd rather kept if
same as the data-sheet if the requirement of "no-underscores" is not
"hard". (If it is, then I'll drop the underscore).
Other than that I agree with all of your points. Thanks for checking
this! Appreciated!
Yours,
--Matti
--
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland
~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Powered by blists - more mailing lists