linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: update mediator information in CoC docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87tu50v6iq.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Wed, 21 Sep 2022 14:04:13 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joanna.lee@...mer.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: update mediator information in CoC docs

Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> writes:

> Update mediator information in the CoC interpretation document.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst
> index e899f14a4ba2..4f8a06b00f60 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ the Technical Advisory Board (TAB) or other maintainers if you're
>  uncertain how to handle situations that come up.  It will not be
>  considered a violation report unless you want it to be.  If you are
>  uncertain about approaching the TAB or any other maintainers, please
> -reach out to our conflict mediator, Mishi Choudhary <mishi@...ux.com>.
> +reach out to our conflict mediator, Joanna Lee <joanna.lee@...mer.com>.
>  
>  In the end, "be kind to each other" is really what the end goal is for
>  everybody.  We know everyone is human and we all fail at times, but the

Applied (finally), thanks.

I stuck a Cc: stable on there, it seems this should be updated in all of
the distributed kernels.

Thanks,

jon