[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yyt8s5+pyoysVNeC@spud>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 22:05:55 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: Similar SoCs with different CPUs and interrupt bindings
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 12:08:11PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> > > This worked as expected, but couldn't get the arithmetic operation
> > > working. Could you please provide an example?
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043.dtsi
> > index ff6aab388eb7..0ecca775fa3f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043.dtsi
> > @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
> > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/clock/r9a07g043-cpg.h>
> >
> > +#define SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ_NUMBER(na) (na + 32)
> > +#define SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ(nr, na) GIC_SPI nr SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ_NUMBER(na)
>
> #define SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ(nr, flags) GIC_SPI
> SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ_NUMBER(nr) flags
>
> > / {
> > compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043";
> > #address-cells = <2>;
> > @@ -128,7 +130,7 @@ ssi1: ssi@...4a000 {
> > compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-ssi",
> > "renesas,rz-ssi";
> > reg = <0 0x1004a000 0 0x400>;
> > - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 330 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + interrupts = <SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ(330, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
> >
> >
> >
> > Or any other method like that....
>
> Oh cool, seems like arithmetic is supported.
> No idea what I did wrong last time I tried...
Oh sick, it does actually work??? So, am I missing something or is this
sort of approach now a no-brainer?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists