[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5b8d028-41a2-6a77-817b-37d9d7424594@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:39:13 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] ata: libata-eh: Remove the unneeded result
variable
On 9/20/22 15:29, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
>
> Return the value ata_port_abort() directly instead of storing it in
> another redundant variable.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
Applied to for-6.1. Thanks !
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> index 7c128c89b454..7dbca2a2f9ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> @@ -1086,14 +1086,11 @@ static void __ata_port_freeze(struct ata_port *ap)
> */
> int ata_port_freeze(struct ata_port *ap)
> {
> - int nr_aborted;
> -
> WARN_ON(!ap->ops->error_handler);
>
> __ata_port_freeze(ap);
> - nr_aborted = ata_port_abort(ap);
>
> - return nr_aborted;
> + return ata_port_abort(ap);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_port_freeze);
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists