[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220921003201.1441511-1-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:31:49 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/12] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block
Non-x86 folks, there's nothing interesting to see here, y'all got pulled
in because removing KVM_REQ_UNHALT requires deleting kvm_clear_request()
from arch code.
Note, this based on:
https://github.com/sean-jc/linux.git tags/kvm-x86-6.1-1
to pre-resolve conflicts with the event/exception cleanups in there.
In Paolo's words...
The following backtrace:
[ 1355.807187] kvm_vcpu_map+0x159/0x190 [kvm]
[ 1355.807628] nested_svm_vmexit+0x4c/0x7f0 [kvm_amd]
[ 1355.808036] ? kvm_vcpu_block+0x54/0xa0 [kvm]
[ 1355.808450] svm_check_nested_events+0x97/0x390 [kvm_amd]
[ 1355.808920] kvm_check_nested_events+0x1c/0x40 [kvm]
[ 1355.809396] kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable+0x4e/0x190 [kvm]
[ 1355.809892] kvm_vcpu_check_block+0x4f/0x100 [kvm]
[ 1355.811259] kvm_vcpu_block+0x6b/0xa0 [kvm]
can occur due to kmap being called in non-sleepable (!TASK_RUNNING) context.
The fix is to extend kvm_x86_ops->nested_ops.hv_timer_pending() to cover
all events not already checked in kvm_arch_vcpu_is_runnable(), and then
get rid of the annoying (and wrong) call to kvm_check_nested_events()
from kvm_vcpu_check_block().
Beware, this is not a complete fix, because kvm_guest_apic_has_interrupt()
might still _read_ memory from non-sleepable context. The fix here is
probably to make kvm_arch_vcpu_is_runnable() return -EAGAIN, and in that
case do a round of kvm_vcpu_check_block() polling in sleepable context.
Nevertheless, it is a good start as it pushes the vmexit into vcpu_block().
The series also does a small cleanup pass on kvm_vcpu_check_block(),
removing KVM_REQ_UNHALT in favor of simply calling kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable()
again. Now that kvm_check_nested_events() is not called anymore by
kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(), it is much easier to see that KVM will never
consume the event that caused kvm_vcpu_has_events() to return true,
and therefore it is safe to evaluate it again.
The alternative of propagating the return value of
kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable() up to kvm_vcpu_{block,halt}() is inferior
because it does not quite get right the edge cases where the vCPU becomes
runnable right before schedule() or right after kvm_vcpu_check_block().
While these edge cases are unlikely to truly matter in practice, it is
also pointless to get them "wrong".
v4:
- Make event request if INIT/SIPI is pending when GIF=>1 (SVM) and
on nested VM-Enter (VMX).
- Make an event request at VMXOFF iff it's necessary.
- Keep the INIT/SIPI pending vs. blocked checks separate (for the
above nSVM/nVMX fixes).
- Check the result of kvm_check_nested_events() in vcpu_block().
- Rename INIT/SIPI helpers (hopefully we'll eventually rename all of
the related collateral, e.g. "pending_events" is so misleading).
- Drop pending INIT/SIPI snaphsot to avoid creating weird, conflicting
code when kvm_check_nested_events() is called by vcpu_block().
v3:
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220822170659.2527086-1-pbonzini@redhat.com
- do not propagate the return value of kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable() up to
kvm_vcpu_{block,halt}()
- move and reformat the comment in vcpu_block()
move KVM_REQ_UNHALT removal last
Paolo Bonzini (5):
KVM: x86: make vendor code check for all nested events
KVM: x86: lapic does not have to process INIT if it is blocked
KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block()
KVM: mips, x86: do not rely on KVM_REQ_UNHALT
KVM: remove KVM_REQ_UNHALT
Sean Christopherson (7):
KVM: nVMX: Make an event request when pending an MTF nested VM-Exit
KVM: x86: Rename and expose helper to detect if INIT/SIPI are allowed
KVM: x86: Rename kvm_apic_has_events() to make it INIT/SIPI specific
KVM: SVM: Make an event request if INIT or SIPI is pending when GIF is
set
KVM: nVMX: Make an event request if INIT or SIPI is pending on
VM-Enter
KVM: nVMX: Make event request on VMXOFF iff INIT/SIPI is pending
KVM: x86: Don't snapshot pending INIT/SIPI prior to checking nested
events
Documentation/virt/kvm/vcpu-requests.rst | 28 +--------------
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 1 -
arch/mips/kvm/emulate.c | 6 ++--
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c | 1 -
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr_papr.c | 1 -
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 1 -
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 1 -
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_insn.c | 1 -
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 --
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 38 ++++++--------------
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 9 ++++-
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 3 +-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 33 +++++++++--------
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 46 +++++++++++++++---------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 5 ---
arch/x86/kvm/xen.c | 1 -
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 3 +-
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 +--
20 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
base-commit: 5df50a4a9b60afba4dd2be76d0f0fb8ae8c9beab
--
2.37.3.968.ga6b4b080e4-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists